✦HEALTH · 20% off Purgo Labs✦
Editorial Standards

Editorial Methodology

How Compound Review evaluates research peptides, grades evidence quality, and maintains editorial independence.

Commercial Relationship Disclosure

Compound Review is an independent comparison site. It is not owned or operated by Purgo Labs or by any vendor we review, and we do not sell peptides. We earn affiliate commissions when readers buy through partner links, and we currently have affiliate agreements with several vendors, Purgo Labs among them. Partner links and codes are labelled on every page that carries them. Partnership never changes a score: every vendor, partner or not, is scored on the same public rubric from evidence you can check yourself. See the full Conflict of Interest Policy below.

Our Mission

Compound Review is an independent reference guide for researchers, biohackers, and healthcare professionals who need accurate, mechanism-level information about research peptides. Our goal is to provide the most technically rigorous, evidence-graded peptide reference available on the open web — written at the level of a medical journal, not a supplement blog.

Compound profiles and comparison guides on this site are built from primary literature. Content is reviewed against published studies and updated when new data emerges. Each compound is assigned an evidence tier that honestly reflects the current state of research — including cases where human clinical evidence is absent or where trials have failed to meet their primary endpoints.

Evidence Grading System

We rate the evidence quality for every compound and claim using a five-tier hierarchy based on study design and replication. This rating appears prominently in every compound profile and comparison guide.

Tier 1

Human RCT

Randomized controlled trials in humans. Highest evidence quality. Rare for research peptides — most are still in preclinical stages.

Tier 2

Human Cohort / Phase 1–2 Trial

Non-randomized human studies, Phase 1/2 trials, or observational cohort data. Strong signal but lower causal certainty than RCT.

Tier 3

Animal Model (In Vivo)

Rodent or other animal model studies. Extensive preclinical data exists for most peptides at this tier. Mechanism is well-established but human translation is uncertain.

Tier 4

In Vitro (Cell Culture)

Cell culture or isolated tissue studies. Useful for mechanism elucidation but does not establish in vivo efficacy.

Tier 5

Theoretical / Expert Opinion

Mechanistic extrapolation, expert opinion, or anecdotal reports. Used only to explain plausible mechanisms when direct evidence is absent.

Source Standards

All factual claims in compound profiles and comparison guides are sourced from peer-reviewed literature. We use the following source hierarchy:

Source TypeUsed ForAccepted
PubMed-indexed journalsMechanism, efficacy, safety claimsYes — primary source
ClinicalTrials.govTrial status, phase, enrollmentYes — primary source
FDA / EMA databasesRegulatory status, approval historyYes — primary source
Preprints (bioRxiv, medRxiv)Emerging mechanisms onlyWith explicit caveat
Manufacturer / vendor claimsNever used for efficacy claimsNo
Forum / anecdotal reportsNever used for efficacy claimsNo

Conflict of Interest Policy

Ownership

Compound Review is not owned or operated by any peptide vendor, including Purgo Labs. We do not sell peptides or take orders.

Affiliate Disclosure

We earn commissions on qualifying purchases made through partner links and partner codes. We have affiliate agreements with several vendors; each partner is marked as a partner on the scoreboard and on its own pages.

No Paid Scores

No vendor can pay for a score, a band or a ranking position. Scores come from the same public rubric for every vendor, partner or not, and change only when the evidence changes.

Editorial Independence

Partners have no editorial input. Negative findings, complaints and failed checks are published for partners and non-partners alike.

Content Update Policy

Peptide research moves quickly. We maintain the following update schedule to ensure content accuracy:

Content TypeReview FrequencyTrigger for Immediate Update
Compound profilesQuarterlyNew Phase 2+ trial data, FDA action, significant safety signal
Comparison guidesSemi-annuallyNew head-to-head trial data, mechanism revision in primary literature
Vendor scores and reviewsMonthly re-readNew certificate, closure, policy change, or a correction with evidence
Partner pricesWeeklySale started or ended, stock change

Contact and Corrections

Email hello@compoundreview.com for corrections, vendor evidence, partnership questions or anything else about the site.

What helps us check a correction quickly

  • The page on our site and the line you think is wrong.
  • A link to the evidence: a lab certificate with its lot number, the lab's own verification page, or the product page showing the current price.
  • For vendors: the public page where a policy, address or testing claim is stated.

Scores change only when the evidence changes. Contacting us, partnering with us or paying us never changes a score on its own. When we change a finding, the page shows the new date.

Medical Disclaimer

All content on Compound Review is for educational and research purposes only. The compounds discussed on this site are not FDA-approved for the indications described. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before considering any peptide protocol. Research peptides are intended for laboratory research use only and are not intended for human consumption.